<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Fashion Victim Blues</title>
      <link>http://music.metafilter.com/2439/Fashion-Victim-Blues/</link>
      <description>Comments on MeFi Music post Fashion Victim Blues</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:54:12 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:54:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Fashion Victim Blues</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/2439/Fashion-Victim-Blues</link>	
  	<description>Three merged takes showing (hopefully) the &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.metafilter.com/2435/The-Evolution-of-a-Song&quot;&gt;evolution of a song&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; In honour of &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.metafilter.com/2435/The-Evolution-of-a-Song&quot;&gt;chococat&apos;s post&lt;/a&gt; earlier today, I dug out three evolving versions of this song we used to do in the Failsworth Pilgrims - (It&apos;s Matt&apos;s tune and lyrics.) I though it neatly illustrated 
a) Three different &quot;sounds&quot; of the same song.
b) That the last version isn&apos;t always the best. 

The first version is the simple demo version with just Matt on - (although i think there&apos;s some violin and second guitar in there too - I&apos;m assuming he didn&apos;t know we were recording this as it doesn&apos;t seem to be a &quot;take&quot;.

The second version is a jammed band version. This is probably where we should have left it. It sounds like we&apos;re actually trying in this version. Unfamilar with the structure, sober enough to listen and relying on our skills playing with each other, as opposed to muscle memory, this is us sounding like a band. Despite it not really being a song as such, this is the trackI listen to when i want to be reminded what a good band we were.

The third version is included for the sake of completion. This is a few hours later and, though we&apos;re probably enjoying ourselves more, we&apos;re clearly drunk and fucking around. It also includes one of the more appaling fluffed endings you&apos;ll hear today. Eesh.

&lt;small&gt;This song was written by Matt Evans, my only contribution here is acoustic guitar, time-keeping and a &quot;yeah!&quot; in the second take.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:music.metafilter.com,2008:site.2439</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:32:46 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Jofus</dc:creator>
	
	    <category>bluegrass</category>
	
	    <category>country</category>
	
	    <category>evolution</category>
	
	    <category>failsworthpilgrims</category>
	
	    <category>shitkicking</category>
	
	    <category>workinprogress</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: uncleozzy</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/2439/Fashion-Victim-Blues#12146</link>	
  	<description>I dig this, a lot.  I agree that the second version is the most cohesive, but at the same time, the third one&apos;s got some charm, too.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This evolution-of-a-song thing is a neat experiment.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2008:site.2439-12146</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:54:12 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>uncleozzy</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Jofus</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/2439/Fashion-Victim-Blues#12151</link>	
  	<description>Take 1 ends at about 3:00&lt;br&gt;
Take 2 is 3:00 - 5:30&lt;br&gt;
Take 3 is 5:30 until the &amp;quot;You&apos;re all fired&amp;quot;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2008:site.2439-12151</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:39:01 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Jofus</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: chococat</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/2439/Fashion-Victim-Blues#12152</link>	
  	<description>Beautiful.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2008:site.2439-12152</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:46:25 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>chococat</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: cortex</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/2439/Fashion-Victim-Blues#12156</link>	
  	<description>Nice!  The second one feels, yeah, the most considered&amp;mdash;there&apos;s what I want to pin as reptition-worn casualness to esp. the vocals in the third one, though that might just be drunk and tired coming into instead.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The second take reminds me a lot of a Canadian band called &amp;quot;McGnarley&apos;s Rant&amp;quot;&amp;mdash;I (badly) played improv banjo on a couple songs when they swung through town a few years ago, since they knew my sister and phonecalls etc&amp;mdash;while the third version sounds more like that &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.metafilter.com/23/Diamond-Joe&quot;&gt;boot-stomping good time&lt;/a&gt; that introduced me to you guys.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2008:site.2439-12156</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:22:15 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>cortex</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Astro Zombie</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/2439/Fashion-Victim-Blues#12189</link>	
  	<description>Weirdly, had I not know that this is three takes, I would simply have thought it was one version with three distinct movements, and I love when the chaos takes over at the end.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2008:site.2439-12189</guid>
  	<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:33:01 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Astro Zombie</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
