<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Propellerhead's Record in Beta</title>
      <link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta/</link>
      <description>Comments on MeFi Music post Propellerhead's Record in Beta</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:49:06 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:49:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Propellerhead&apos;s Record in Beta</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta</link>	
  	<description>So Props new product &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.propellerheads.se/products/record/&quot;&gt;Record&lt;/a&gt; is in beta, I&apos;ve &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.propellerheads.se/betatest/sign-up/index.cfm&quot;&gt;signed&lt;/a&gt; up. I&apos;m kinda disappointed that they didn&apos;t include any kind of plugin architecture natively. I can handle not having plugins, b/c of  ReWire, but it would have been nice to have esp. for tools like Melodyne. On the plus side, the arrangement and mixing additions look very, very nice. </description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:51:26 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>bigmusic</dc:creator>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mary8nne</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17190</link>	
  	<description>Could you record Audio in Reason?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
looks nice. i the mix engine supposed to sound like an SSL?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17190</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 05:49:06 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mary8nne</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: bigmusic</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17191</link>	
  	<description>The mixing desk is supposed to be modeled after the SLL, but the proof is in the pudding.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17191</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 07:59:14 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>bigmusic</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: sundri</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17192</link>	
  	<description>The lack of plug-in architecture makes it useless as a DAW IMO.  Looks like I wont be getting rid of ableton or Logic anytime soon.  I am still going to check it out though, the virtual mixing desk made me drool a bit.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17192</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:36:36 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>sundri</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Paid In Full</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17194</link>	
  	<description>I enjoyed the &amp;quot;band&amp;quot; in that promo video far more than I should have. Comedy goodness.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17194</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 11:39:38 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Paid In Full</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: uncleozzy</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17195</link>	
  	<description>The mixer looks like a nightmare.  Twisting virtual knobs with a mouse is incredibly frustrating.  I hope you&apos;d be able to enter values with the keyboard.  The fluid time-stretching is pretty nice, though, as is the included POD and Bass POD.  Hell, if the PODs include the model packs, it&apos;d just about be worth the price of admission.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Still, for the price, I&apos;d probably take Logic, but hey, if it sounds good and works for you, go for it.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17195</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 12:21:16 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>uncleozzy</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: pyramid termite</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17203</link>	
  	<description>&lt;i&gt;The lack of plug-in architecture makes it useless as a DAW IMO.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
i don&apos;t know - if one has a 2nd computer to run the softsynths on, you could just record as another audio track - (tobybear&apos;s minihost is great for this) - basically, they&apos;ve added audio recording capability to a reason set up, if you have reason&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
299 seems like a bit much for that&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
---&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;The mixer looks like a nightmare. Twisting virtual knobs with a mouse is incredibly frustrating. I hope you&apos;d be able to enter values with the keyboard.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
you can record your knob twidding, of course - and something like a korg nanocontrol is much more useful than a mouse&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
although i prefer to play in a way that fits in with the rest of the tracks without a lot of manipulation of knobs, so i can keep levels fairly constant - it&apos;s hard to do, but it&apos;s worth the effort</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17203</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:49:52 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>pyramid termite</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: pyramid termite</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17204</link>	
  	<description>well, it&apos;s 149 if you already have reason</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17204</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:52:51 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>pyramid termite</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: awfurby</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17205</link>	
  	<description>Yeah I just can&apos;t understand why music software designers persist with creating controls that are knobs - mouse dragging to twist a circle is just about the stupidest interaction method on a computer that I&apos;ve ever seen. That and relying on someone not being colourblind to know that a particular control is off or on (red-green). Fuck I hate that.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Meanwhile, back to Record - I read the CDM review of it but I have to say the reason for it still eludes me. I even watched the video and still couldn&apos;t see the benefits. I would like to try it out though - I switched from Acid to Ableton a while ago and to be honest I still haven&apos;t really gotten used to Ableton. Mind you I haven&apos;t had enough time to either...</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17205</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:55:40 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>awfurby</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Grangousier</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17211</link>	
  	<description>In Logic, clicking on the knobs and dragging up or down will have the same effect as twisting them. I have a mind to see whether the scroll-wheel on my Wacom tablet&apos;s mouse has the same effect (maybe it does, and maybe I&apos;ve been doing it for months without noticing). Perhaps it&apos;s the same here. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I confess, I can&apos;t see the point of this program either, but then I&apos;ve found my own personal preferred DAW (as I  mentioned, Logic), so perhaps this is going to be someone else&apos;s. It does come down to taste so much.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17211</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 12:57:20 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Grangousier</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: chimaera</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17215</link>	
  	<description>As far as I can tell it&apos;s only really a killer app if you are already a user of Reason -- it brings in .rns files natively instead of via some weird rewire setup.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have every intention of getting this and using it (I love the Reason vocoder so much I put vocal tracks into the sampler to use it), but if you&apos;re not a Reason person, I have to say I don&apos;t see much reason to get it.... but if you ARE a Reason user and love using it, this is the sort of thing you&apos;ve probably been waiting for.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17215</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:02:15 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>chimaera</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: jake</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3371/Propellerheads-Record-in-Beta#17310</link>	
  	<description>I so wish Propellerhead would do what Image Line did and make (at least some of) their devices available as standalone VST / VSTi plugins. That would be the killer app, for me. I&apos;m not switching away from Cubase as a master DAW any time soon, and being unable to route my own audio through Reason&apos;s effects modules is kind of lame.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3371-17310</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 11:44:04 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
