<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Raw Anxious Hands</title>
      <link>http://music.metafilter.com/3498/Raw-Anxious-Hands/</link>
      <description>Comments on MeFi Music post Raw Anxious Hands</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:12:42 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:12:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Raw Anxious Hands</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3498/Raw-Anxious-Hands</link>	
  	<description>Help me understand why I like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.metafilter.com/3492/Anxious-Hands-v2-raw&quot;&gt;raw track &lt;/a&gt;better than the &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.metafilter.com/3497/Anxious-Hands-v2-mixed&quot;&gt;final mix&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I found MajorDundee&apos;s comments on &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.metafilter.com/3474/Regrets&quot;&gt;Regrets&lt;/a&gt; very helpful, I can hear how the hard pan on the guitars in the rough mix opens everything up compared to the final. So I thought I&apos;d post before and after versions of the song from that session that I liked the least in the final mix and ask for some feedback. 

Don&apos;t worry about hurting my feelings-- I didn&apos;t mix it, I&apos;m just looking to learn some thngs that could help me out in future sessions.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3498</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:43:35 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>InfidelZombie</dc:creator>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Karlos the Jackal</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3498/Raw-Anxious-Hands#18060</link>	
  	<description>Yeah, I like the wide panning on the raw version.  The v2 version sounds a little squished into the middle -- I&apos;ve got nothing against mono, but on v2 it sounds like the band just...doesn&apos;t take up much space?  (Compared to the dirty guitar blast from the 2006 version, especially.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m not a big fan of the drum sound on either version; I feel like they could use a little more &lt;em&gt;uhh!!&lt;/em&gt;.  (I am not sure how to put this in proper engineer lingo.)  They&apos;re a little tame, maybe -- not the playing, but the sound.  Maybe they&apos;re too dry for me.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3498-18060</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:12:42 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Karlos the Jackal</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: chimaera</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3498/Raw-Anxious-Hands#18064</link>	
  	<description>I&apos;m pretty sure it&apos;s the panning. This isn&apos;t a song where you really want to tinker with the &amp;quot;space&amp;quot; of it throughout the song, because it doesn&apos;t really pay off by squishing the guitars to the middle just so the backing vocals can &amp;quot;stick out&amp;quot; in the wide panning. I say go with the wide guitars.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3498-18064</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:16:32 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>chimaera</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: snsranch</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3498/Raw-Anxious-Hands#18068</link>	
  	<description>Definitely what those guys ^  said.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On the first track I can hear every instrument clearly and brightly (including some bitchen bass rumble), but the vox is a bit low.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On the second I&apos;m struggling to hear the voice of each instrument.  I&apos;m really missing the original dynamics, but then the vocal is just right.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think the Major&apos;s suggestions are pretty good, but were probably meant to be a very subtle fine tuning.   &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;d love to hear the original with the vocal level brought up just a bit...maybe just a little more than a bit.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3498-18068</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:45:43 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>snsranch</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: frenetic</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3498/Raw-Anxious-Hands#18097</link>	
  	<description>The lack of panning is an issue -- the first track has a sense of space, a band playing in a room -- but there&apos;s barely any low-end on the mixed track as well. On the raw track I can hear the bass guitar and a bit of kick and on the mixed track there&apos;s far less.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Maybe post your raw source tracks so people can take a shot at mixing?</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3498-18097</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:07:22 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>frenetic</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: InfidelZombie</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3498/Raw-Anxious-Hands#18141</link>	
  	<description>Wish I had access to the source tracks, but this was done a couple years back and I never got a copy.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks everybody for your comments, I appreciate the input.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3498-18141</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:23:32 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>InfidelZombie</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: mary8nne</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3498/Raw-Anxious-Hands#18582</link>	
  	<description>yeah the Raw mix totally sounds better. Fuller.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3498-18582</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:43:02 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>mary8nne</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
