<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Samuel Barber -- String Quartet, Op. 11: II. Molto adagio; molto allegro</title>
      <link>http://music.metafilter.com/3509/Samuel-Barber-String-Quartet-Op-11-II-Molto-adagio-molto-allegro/</link>
      <description>Comments on MeFi Music post Samuel Barber -- String Quartet, Op. 11: II. Molto adagio; molto allegro</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:40:01 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:40:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Samuel Barber -- String Quartet, Op. 11: II. Molto adagio; molto allegro</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3509/Samuel-Barber-String-Quartet-Op-11-II-Molto-adagio-molto-allegro</link>	
  	<description>Another personal homework assignment to prepare for writing a string quartet -- this time, it&apos;s Samuel Barber&apos;s String Quartet, Op. 11. The second movement was extracted to become Barber&apos;s one-hit wonder, the Adagio for Strings. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; For this recording, I opted to include the rest of the quartet&apos;s second movement, which is a reprise of its first. I uploaded this movement first because it&apos;s more recognizable.

Once &lt;a href=&quot;http://music.metafilter.com/3427/Arvo-Prt-Fratres-fr-streichquartett&quot;&gt;again&lt;/a&gt;, I&apos;m using the Reason Orkester library, with a little help from the Garritan Personal Orchestra Refill.
</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3509</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:57:39 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>NemesisVex</dc:creator>
	
	    <category>eponymous4</category>
	
	    <category>samuelbarber</category>
	
	    <category>stringquartet</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: cortex</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3509/Samuel-Barber-String-Quartet-Op-11-II-Molto-adagio-molto-allegro#18213</link>	
  	<description>It&apos;s really pretty interesting to listen to this stuff and suss out what works vs. what doesn&apos;t as far as the synth instrumentation goes.  I remember think Switched On Bach was just silly and corny when I first heard it as kid, having no context for it&apos;s place in recording history.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
How far this stuff has come in the mean time, and yet how hard it is to sort of close that gap and get out of the uncanny valley, if you will, is pretty interesting to me.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, nice work.  Smart of you to exercise first like this; I&apos;m really looking forward to hear what you end up writing when you get down to the actual quartet.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3509-18213</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:40:01 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>cortex</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: acro</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3509/Samuel-Barber-String-Quartet-Op-11-II-Molto-adagio-molto-allegro#18220</link>	
  	<description>This is great, thanks for sharing with metailfer.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3509-18220</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:30:01 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>acro</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: acro</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3509/Samuel-Barber-String-Quartet-Op-11-II-Molto-adagio-molto-allegro#18221</link>	
  	<description>(and MetaFilter) &lt;small&gt;Oh pre-view.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3509-18221</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:30:51 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>acro</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: NemesisVex</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3509/Samuel-Barber-String-Quartet-Op-11-II-Molto-adagio-molto-allegro#18224</link>	
  	<description>At the very least, it&apos;s been a great exercise in reading alto and tenor clef, but I have to admit, I still have no idea what I want to do with my own quartet. I just know I don&apos;t want the one I wrote right before college to be the only one.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My eyes were playing tricks on me -- I read acro&apos;s username as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.8notes.com/glossary/Arco.asp&quot;&gt;arco&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3509-18224</guid>
  	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:06:14 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>NemesisVex</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: dagosto</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/3509/Samuel-Barber-String-Quartet-Op-11-II-Molto-adagio-molto-allegro#18336</link>	
  	<description>I thought I was the only person who ever did this. I did similar transcriptions of some pieces while in school to help me with my harmonic analysis and before composing some ensemble pieces.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Keep in mind that real string players will stretch the tuning a bit to sweeten dissonances that sound a bit sour when played back through an equal tempered (or even stretch tuned)  synthesizer. I wrote my first string quartet using this method and found myself being a bit more conservative with harmonies than I wanted to be.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2009:site.3509-18336</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:51:53 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>dagosto</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
