<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Imprint</title>
      <link>http://music.metafilter.com/469/Imprint/</link>
      <description>Comments on MeFi Music post Imprint</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:35:24 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:35:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Imprint</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/469/Imprint</link>	
  	<description>I wanted to write a song with only (or mostly) four chords, and I ended up with something about the inaccuracies of memory.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:music.metafilter.com,2006:site.469</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:01:51 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>NemesisVex</dc:creator>
	
	    <category>eponymous4</category>
	
	    <category>memory</category>
	
	    <category>pop</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: cortex</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/469/Imprint#1852</link>	
  	<description>I like this song, but the high note in the chorus hook is a huge problem&amp;mdash;it&apos;s warbly and a full semitone flat &lt;i&gt;every single time&lt;/i&gt;, which is incredibly distracting to listen to.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I suspect you&apos;re pushing the top of your range there.  Dangerous territory&amp;mdash;you need to determine if it&apos;s possible, and if so whether it&apos;s worth it.  Dropping a half- or full-step to accomodate the less strained areas of your vocal range is a really, really good idea when you bump up against that sort of wall.  And it&apos;s a good composition aside from that.  If you want to do the work, I&apos;d heartily recommend you rerecord in a lower key and &lt;i&gt;nail&lt;/i&gt; that chorus.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2006:site.469-1852</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:35:24 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>cortex</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: NemesisVex</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/469/Imprint#1854</link>	
  	<description>I did make a gamble with this song. I experimented with changing the key of the entire song, but I didn&apos;t like the way that first diminished chord sounded in other keys -- something about it felt right in that particular key. But the original meldoy (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eponymous4.com/audio/Eponymous_4_-_Imprint.mp3&quot;&gt;instrumental version here&lt;/a&gt;) ended up too low for my range. So I shift the starting point of the melody and adjusted a few notes to accomodate.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That top note is actually clashing with the bass -- Eb in the bass, E in the melody. I kept in there because I liked how uncomfortable it made me feel.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The best solution, though, would be to find an actual singer who can hit that note.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2006:site.469-1854</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:17:45 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>NemesisVex</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: cortex</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/469/Imprint#1855</link>	
  	<description>Well, go intentional dissonance, then.  :)  Got to hit that note harder and cleaner, though, so we know that you &lt;i&gt;mean&lt;/i&gt; it.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2006:site.469-1855</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:20:11 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>cortex</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Zephyrial</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/469/Imprint#1933</link>	
  	<description>I really really like the song - no joke. At first I had a problem with the intentional dissonance (usually I&apos;m a huge fan of dissonance, but there&apos;s a line where it just doesn&apos;t make sense and is distracting and uncomfortable for the listener), but the more I listened to it the more I liked it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One way to make the dissonance work more cleanly (if that&apos;s not an oxymoron) would be to include the dissonant note(s) in the accompaniment as well as the vocals.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My only other problem in general was the singing. The soft, dry singing works really well with the musical style and with the subject matter, but a lot of notes (not just the high ones) I thought were a little off pitch.  Maybe listening to a track with just the vocal line plunked out on piano might help you sing it more confidently (since the instrumental track is pretty sparse).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Great song, though!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2006:site.469-1933</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:31:16 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Zephyrial</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
