<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Relics</title>
      <link>http://music.metafilter.com/6745/Relics/</link>
      <description>Comments on MeFi Music post Relics</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:06:42 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:06:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Relics</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/6745/Relics</link>	
  	<description>Just a pop song.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:music.metafilter.com,2013:site.6745</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:56:12 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Lutoslawski</dc:creator>
	
	    <category>piano</category>
	
	    <category>vocals</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: capricorn</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/6745/Relics#34330</link>	
  	<description>Great to hear more from you guys.  Loving the chord progressions on this.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2013:site.6745-34330</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:06:42 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>capricorn</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: greenish</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/6745/Relics#34376</link>	
  	<description>Yeah the song is a really interesting structure, the chords come unexpectedly which is always a nice surprise in a world of 2-5-1 blandness!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
However I found the mix a little challenging to listen to - the reverb on the vocal is so much bigger than on the other instruments, it sounded a little incongruous, and the drums contrasted with it a little too much for my preference, especially as they have such a processed sound (not that this in itself is a problem, it&apos;s clearly part of the way you&apos;re approaching them for this track). Anyway the huge reverb on the vocal was a little dominating for me, and alongside the very busy piano part meant that the mix as a whole was sometimes kind of impenetrable. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Woo... too much rambling about mixing? Yes I think so. Apologies :)</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2013:site.6745-34376</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:20:02 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>greenish</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Lutoslawski</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/6745/Relics#34381</link>	
  	<description>Hey greenish, that&apos;s actually really helpful stuff about the mix. I know next to nothing about mixing and am just sort of trying to figure it out as I go.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So, if I took down the reverb on the vocal - any other tips on how to make it sound less impenetrable? I worry also that it isn&apos;t just the mixing - the piano part is really busy, and sometimes I think if I stripped it all down it would be better generally. I have a bunch of similar tracks and I&apos;m trying to figure out how to mix them well. Thanks a lot!</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2013:site.6745-34381</guid>
  	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:09:55 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Lutoslawski</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: greenish</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/6745/Relics#34387</link>	
  	<description>I think the piano part is ace, but would be tempted to reduce the volume a bit during the verse sections, so that the vocal can come through. The volume is very static, and if you can imagine a pianist playing alongside a vocalist, they would naturally play more quietly when the vocalist was singing, although likely become louder during the chorus where things tend to reach a natural climax, as they do here (I mean the &amp;quot;why do I keep these...&amp;quot; parts)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is it sequenced? If so you can easily automate it to imitate this. If it&apos;s not sequenced, why don&apos;t you re-play it with the drums and vocals in your headphones, so that you can play more sympathetically to the other parts? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I wouldn&apos;t necessarily simplify it, it&apos;s part of the song that it&apos;s so busy, just make sure it&apos;s not fighting for position with the vocal :)</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2013:site.6745-34387</guid>
  	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:19:17 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>greenish</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: Lutoslawski</title>
  	<link>http://music.metafilter.com/6745/Relics#34409</link>	
  	<description>Thanks again, greenish. It isn&apos;t sequenced. I can definitely replay it. Though one reason I&apos;ve always been a bad accompanist is because I play way too loud over everyone.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:music.metafilter.com,2013:site.6745-34409</guid>
  	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:45:07 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>Lutoslawski</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
